/8 min

Endangered and Restricted Timbers: What Woodworkers Need to Know About CITES

Endangered and Restricted Timbers: What Woodworkers Need to Know About CITES

The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is a binding international treaty ratified by 183 countries. It governs the cross-border movement of species — timber included. For woodworkers, luthiers, furniture makers, and architects sourcing exotic timbers, CITES is not an abstraction. Customs agencies in the US (under the Lacey Act), the EU, and the UK actively enforce it. Confiscation, fines, and in serious cases criminal prosecution are the consequences of non-compliance. Ignorance of a species' CITES status is not a recognized defense.


How CITES Works: Three Appendices

CITES operates through three appendices, each defining a different level of restriction. The system applies to international trade — movement across borders — not to domestic buying and selling within a country, though national laws may impose additional constraints. The appendices are reviewed and updated at the Conference of the Parties (CoP), held roughly every three years. The 2017 CoP saw the most significant timber-related additions in the treaty's history.


Appendix I: Commercial Trade Prohibited

Appendix I lists species threatened with extinction for which commercial international trade is prohibited. Permits exist only for strictly non-commercial purposes: scientific research, conservation breeding, or exceptional circumstances requiring Management and Scientific Authority approval from both exporting and importing nations. For woodworkers, the critical entry is Brazilian Rosewood (Dalbergia nigra), listed at CoP8 in 1992. This single listing effectively ended the guitar industry's primary tonewood supply. Pre-1992 specimens — instruments, blanks, and processed lumber manufactured before the listing — can cross borders with documentation proving their origin predates CITES. New commercial trade in D. nigra is banned, period. The industry's pivot to East Indian Rosewood was a direct regulatory consequence. Kokerboom (Aloidendron dichotomum) is also Appendix I. Any Appendix I species found without pre-CITES documentation will be seized at customs.


Appendix II: Regulated Trade with Permits

Appendix II does not prohibit trade. It requires that the exporting country issue a CITES export permit — certifying the specimen was legally acquired and that the export will not be detrimental to wild populations (a Non-Detriment Finding, or NDF). Importing countries may additionally require import permits depending on national legislation.


The 2017 CoP17 in Johannesburg was a watershed for timber. The entire Dalbergia genus — all commercially traded rosewoods and blackwoods — was added to Appendix II. This swept in species that had been lightly regulated or unmonitored: African Blackwood (D. melanoxylon), East Indian Rosewood (D. latifolia), Honduran Rosewood (D. stevensonii), and approximately 280 other Dalbergia species. Other Appendix II timbers include: Lignum Vitae (Guaiacum officinale and G. sanctum), Big Leaf Mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla), Ramin (Gonystylus spp.), Ebonies (Diospyros spp.), and Pernambuco (Paubrasilia echinata) — the bow-maker's wood.


Appendix III: Country-Initiated Monitoring

Appendix III is invoked unilaterally by individual member countries for species they wish to monitor within their own borders. Unlike Appendix I and II, which require multilateral consensus, a country can self-list a species. Export from the listing country requires a Certificate of Origin; export from other countries requires only a Certificate of Origin confirming the specimen did not originate from the listing country. Bigleaf Maple has been listed by the US under Appendix III in some trade frameworks. Appendix III is the least restrictive tier, but customs documentation is still required. Current listings change; consult the official CITES species database before any import.


The Lacey Act and Parallel National Laws

CITES is international law. National legislation adds a second layer. In the United States, the Lacey Act prohibits trade in illegally harvested plants and plant products — including timber — regardless of CITES status. It applies to any wood entering the US supply chain and requires importers to declare species, country of harvest, and quantity. The EU Timber Regulation (EUTR) and the UK Timber Regulation (UKTR) impose due diligence requirements on all operators placing timber on their markets. These laws catch species not covered by CITES and can prosecute violations committed elsewhere.


Practical Guidance: Sourcing, Documentation, and Alternatives

Use scientific names. "Rosewood" is commercially ambiguous — it is applied to species across multiple genera. Dalbergia species are CITES Appendix II (or I for D. nigra). "Bolivian Rosewood" (Machaerium scleroxylon), "Amazon Rosewood" (Bobgunnia fistuloides), and "Brazilian Cherry" (Hymenaea courbaril) are not Dalbergia and are not Appendix-listed. Scientific names resolve ambiguity.


Request documentation proactively. A CITES permit or certificate accompanies legal shipments of Appendix-listed species. For finished instruments or small quantities of processed lumber, a de minimis exemption may apply — but the burden is on the importer to verify. For Dalbergia, request the export permit number and verify it against the CITES trade database where possible. Chain-of-custody records — FSC or PEFC — add a second layer of verification.


Consider alternatives. Browse the Library for non-listed species with comparable aesthetics and working properties. Sapele, Wenge, and Hard Maple offer strong visual character without CITES documentation requirements. FSC-certified plantation teak is the sustainable alternative for outdoor and marine specification. Read the Teak Sustainability Report.


CITES vs. the IUCN Red List

The two systems are independent and do not map directly onto each other. The IUCN Red List classifies species by extinction risk — Least Concern, Vulnerable, Endangered, Critically Endangered. It is a scientific assessment; it does not regulate trade. A species can be Critically Endangered on the IUCN and not CITES-listed. The reverse is also true: species may be Appendix II for precautionary monitoring while carrying a Least Concern IUCN status. For complete sourcing diligence: CITES determines legal requirements; IUCN informs ethical judgment. Both should be consulted.